More Resources

Bannuru et al. (2019)

OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteo. Cartl. 27(11).

Cherian et al. (2015)

Strength and functional improvement using pneumatic brace with extension assist for end-stage knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized trial. J. Arthroplasty. 30(5).

Duncan et al. (2006)

Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis – it all depends on your point of view. Rheum. 45(6)

Hart et al. (2017)

The prevalence of radiographic and MRI-defined patellofemoral osteoarthritis and structural pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. B. J. Sports Med. 51(16).

Heekin & Fokin (2014)

Incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients undergoing total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the time ripe for a less radical treatment?. J. Knee Surg. 27(1).

Jevsevar (2013)

Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 21(9).

McAlindon et al. (2014)

OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteo. Cartl. 22(3).

Messier et al. (2018)

Intentional weight loss in overweight and obese patients with knee osteoarthritis: is more better? Arthritis Care Res. (Hobokin) 70(11).

Military Case Study

Levitation TCU Knee Brace Case Study: 18-year-old male with patellar dislocation, fracture, and osteochondral lesion.

Tubach et al. (2005)

Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64(1).

Zhang et al. (2008)

OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteo. Cartl. 16.

Research Summary

The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application

Binkley, J.M., Stratford, P.W., Lott, S.A., and Riddle, D.L. (1999). Phys. Ther. 79(4): 371–83.

Key Findings

Internally reliable

The LEFS met test-retest reliability and internal consistency measures.

Constructively Valid

LEFS scores correlated with scores from the SF-36, indicating its construct validity.

Sensitive to change over time

Prognoses by physical therapists correlated with changes to patients’ LEFS scores over time.

At the time of this study, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) was a newly-developed condition-specific measure distinguished by its ease of application and scoring and its potential to apply to a broad range of lower-extremity orthopaedic conditions. To determine its usefulness as a clinical and research tool, the LEFS was evaluated based on its reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity to change.

To determine its internal reliability, the LEFS was administered and readministered to patients at set intervals. Construct validity was determined by administering the SF-36, a generic measure that has served as a comparison for condition-specific measures in past studies, at certain intervals, and then checking for correlations between the two measures. To evaluate the measures’ sensitivity to change, physical therapists provided prognoses for each of the patients, which were then correlated with changes to the patients’ LEFS and SF-36 scores during a set interval.

Results indicated that the LEFS is a reliable and valid measure for a broad range of lower-extremity conditions, and is also sensitive to change to a degree that makes it an appropriate measure to implement at the individual patient level. In fact, results showed that the LEFS is better at detecting changes in lower-extremity function than the SF-36.

Relevance to Levitation

As a measure that has been deemed reliable, valid, and sensitive to change by Binkley et al. (1999), the LEFS has been used as one of the measures to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Levitation. In a retrospective pilot study, wearing Levitation for one month resulted in statistically significant improvements to physical function 1– Budarick, A.R. et al. (2020) J. Prosthet. Orthot. Under Peer Review.. These findings were based on changes in patients’ LEFS scores that passed the minimum clinically relevant threshold.

more on this topic...